One of the more interesting stories
found in the book of Ether is that of King Lib. In the Jaredite's king list, he is one of the
middle kings, half way between Jared and Coriantumr.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb48f/eb48fc8cc36a62a481e0c4d7088a3040135cf93d" alt="" |
Zapatera Island |
I
estimate that he lived in the neighborhood of 900 BC. During his
reign the plague of serpents blocking the Narrow Neck of Land was destroyed. It is also recorded that he built a great city at the
place where the sea divides the land. This place was near the Narrow
Neck of Land. But before we go into detail, let us review the story
and get some more background.
In the book of Ether we read the story
of King Heth. He rebelled against the Lord, refused to obey his
commandments, and killed his messengers. The Lord in his displeasure
cursed the people with a severe drought which resulted in wide spread
crop failure and famine. At the same time a plague of poisonous snakes moved down from the north killing animals and men as they swept southward.
The surviving animals fled before the serpents, going through the
narrow neck of land, and into the land southward, which the Nephites would later call Bountiful and Zarahemla. The snakes stopped migrating south and occupied the narrow neck, preventing any humans from passing through. Thus
the narrow neck was effectively blocked for the reign of four
Jaredite kings—approximately 300 to 400 years.
The wicked King Heth died as a
result of the previously mentioned famine. His people subsequently repented, and the Lord
then blessed them with renewed rainfall. We find this in chapter 9
of Ether.
Four generations later Lib comes on the
scene. He is a righteous king and is blessed of the Lord. He
devises a way to exterminate the snake infestation (I personally
think he repeatedly burned the area until they were driven off or
destroyed thus rendering the land northward treeless), opens up the southern lands, and builds a great city
north of the narrow neck. However, he reserves the southern lands
for a hunting preserve and as far as we know, no Jaredite cities were
built south of Lib's great city. This is recorded in chapter 10 of
Ether. The scripture is instructive.
“And
in the days of Lib the poisonous serpents were destroyed.
Wherefore
they did go into the land southward, to hunt food for the people of
the land, for the land was covered with animals of the forest. And
Lib also himself became a great hunter.
And
they built a great city by the narrow neck of land, by the place
where the sea divides the land. And
they did preserve the land southward for a wilderness, to get game.
And the whole face of the land northward was covered with
inhabitants (Ether 10:19-21).”
This
is one of the few references linking Nephite and Jaredite geography.
Here the key is the narrow neck of land. The city of Lib was built
near the narrow neck, at the place where the sea divides the land. I
have identified the narrow neck of land as the Isthmus of Rivas in
Nicaragua. It is bound on each side by a sea—the Pacific Ocean on
the west, and Lake Nicaragua on the east.
But
what is the place where the sea divides the land. I believe that
this is an island near the mainland which was significant to the
people of Lib as a ceremonial center. North of the Isthmus of Rivas
is an island near the shore of Lake Nicaragua. It is called Isla
Zapatera and borders the mainland south of the city of Granada. It
is easily seen from the shore, and is no more than 2 kilometers out in
the lake. At one point it is only a half kilometer offshore.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5124d/5124d0f3ef3f6112dc1496395c8dc9c141e61110" alt="" |
Zapatera map |
I
have been wanting to visit and explore this area for some time, and
in January of 2014 the opportunity presented itself. My brother and
I spent 10 days in Nicaragua visiting the sites and museums, and
looking for archaeological evidence of habitation sites. Our
objectives were to 1. Determine if there had been ancient habitations
on the mainland near the island; 2. To determine if any of the
artifacts housed in the local museums of the area could date to
Jaredite times; 3. To visit the ceremonial sites on Zapatera Island
and determine if they could possibly relate to Jaredite culture.
At
the end of our stay in Nicaragua, we felt that our objectives had
been met and that there is a good possibility that Lib's city could
have been located there. I will now discuss each of the objectives
and report on our findings.
Archaeological
evidence on the mainland. Our first clue, that there might have
been an ancient city on the mainland opposite Zapatera Island, came
from a newpaper article published on 18 Sep. 2007 in the Managua
newspaper El Nuevo Diaro. It was entitled “Denucian Saqueo
Arqueoligico (Archaeological Looting Reported).” It mentioned
that beautiful examples of Indian pottery from the mainland opposite
Zapatera Island had been appearing on the black market in Granada.
No further public mention has been made of this report, but it was
enough to pique our interest. While in Nicaragua we were able to
spend two days in that area and were able to make friends with
several of the local inhabitants.
San
Jose Mombacho is the headquarters of a large ranch, twenty
kilometers, by way of a dirt road, east of the main highway. One of
the ranch hands there showed us the first site, and directed us to
his step-daughter, whose son took us to the second one. In both
sites, graves had been opened, and the small holes were surrounded
with broken, discarded pottery. They appear to be fairly large
sites which have been only minimally explored. They are about a
mile apart, situated on hillocks along the shore of the lake. I
don't have enough experience to attempt to date the pottery,
however, it does seem to resemble the monochrome style that is
characteristic of the oldest period for that area. We photographed
the sherds and small holes and left them in place. We concluded that
there had indeed been a large inhabited site on the mainland
opposite Zapatera island.
Attempt
to determine if local artifacts could date to Jaredite times. The
earliest date given by scholars for the artifacts of this area is
500 BC. We need to go back to about 900 BC for Lib's time period.
One Nicaraguan archaeological site does in fact date back far enough
to fit our hypothesis. The Acahualinca fossil footprint site, west
of modern Managua, has been dated anywhere from 2000-5000 BC. This
is a site exhibiting ancient human footprints buried beneath up to 4
meters of ash fall sediments which show the presence of people at
this time period.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38503/385035d2c47443f806470492438dc51345703c7b" alt="" |
Fossil footprints |
This
second objective relates specifically to the stone statues which
have been discovered on Zapatera Island, and the surrounding areas. These statues were found at a ceremonial center on the island. Most of these statues are now housed in the San Francisco Convent Museum in Granada. Most scholars estimate that these statues were created by Indians
living after 800 AD, however, no actual scientific dating has been
done on any of them. I have discussed these statues in several previous blogs. I feel that they are much older than most
archaeologists have estimated, and do not resemble the normal art
work of Meso or Central America. I feel that they resemble the art
work of the Sumerian culture of Mesopotamia from which the Jaredites
originated. For example, some of the statues have beards, which is
highly unlikely for native Americans, but is typical for Sumeria.
They are presented in the nude, which is not characteristic of
native American art, but is of Sumerian. They were stationed as
votive images around temples, which is typical for Sumerian statues.
A
comparison was made of different types of statuary in Nicaragua. We
visited the excellent Gregorio
Aguilar Barea Archaeological Museum
in Juigalpa which contains an extensive collection of the local
statuary. The
late period Chontales style statues found there are distinctly
different from those of Zapatera. They were fashioned from columns
of basalt, with only minor alteration of the original form, and are
much cruder in style. The basalt of the Zapatera statues is much
more weathered than that of Juigalpa, which to me would indicate
that it is much older.
We
compared the weathering of the statues in the museums with the
native stone on Zapatera island. The weathering of the two seems to
be comparable, which to me again indicates an ancient origin.
Comparing surface weathering on other stone artifacts would indicate
that the Zapatera statues are much older. For example, there are
numerous ancient grinding stones (or metates) which are apparently
of more recent date. They show much less weathering on the unused
surfaces than do the statues.
From
the original reports of the discoverers, many of the statues were
partially buried in their standing, or reclined, positions. If this
burial resulted from natural causes (ie wind blown sedimentation),
it would indeed indicate an ancient origin.
According
to Ephriam Squier, one of the original discoverers of the statues,
one statue, which was not recovered, was partially buried and lying
under a huge fallen tree, which was impossible to remove. If this
tree were a Cieba Tree, which is the largest species growing in this
region, it could have been as much as 400 years old when it fell,
and have lain there for many years longer.
All
of this seems to validate our hypothesis that the statues are indeed
old enough to be of Jaredite origin.
Visit
the discovery sites of the statues on Zapatera Island. Zapatera
Island is about 20 miles south of Granada, which is the closest
harbour where boats can be rented. We hired a boat and operator and
sailed to the island early one morning and spent part of the day on
the island at Zonzapote. From this small village we hiked a mile or
so to one of the discovery sites. Most of the statuary had been
removed, but there were still a few pieces in the original location.
What was more interesting, were the ancient mounds which had
originally been temple or housing platforms. They are composed of a
stone core and had originally been covered with earth. But they
were so ancient that the earth had all eroded away leaving only the
stone cores. We had earlier visited similar mounds near Juigalpa,
which were apparently much younger. They still had the earth
covering in place and the stone core was only exposed where they had
been excavated.
There
was also a lot of broken and weathered pottery sherds scattered
around the mounds. It appeared to me that very little has been done
in the way of detailed examination or excavation of the Zapatera
site. It is a shame that so little interest is shown by the
government and the scientific community.