data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f22b/2f22b6b764ad02bcbac6263a34b4fd3e2e890a47" alt=""
In the 1850s Ephraim Squier was sent to Nicaragua as the American ambassador. His primary assignment was to evaluate a possible route for an interoceanic canal. He spent a lot of time traveling and wrote extensively about his observations and experiences. His book, Nicaragua; Its People, Scenery, Monuments, and the Proposed Interoceanic Canal, was published in 1852 and is currently available online. I found it very interesting reading.
During his explorations he discovered a number of ancient Indian statues. Many of these were hidden away on an island off the shore of Lake Nicaragua. Squier indicates that the Indians told him that their ancestors had hidden them to preserve them from the Spanish priests who were destroying them in order to eradicate idolatry. The natives had apparently venerated these statues for generations.
Since Squier's day many more of these pre-Columbian statues have been unearth and are currently housed in various museums throughout Nicaragua. Some have even been sent abroad. But in general the statues, which if they had been found in Mesoamerica would have been a subject for intense study, have been largely ignored.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7ade/a7ade6ce76137165263651980a49f21165e8ade9" alt=""
Most researchers feel that the statues are fairly recent and can be dated during the period following the birth of Christ. But recently an archaeologist has suggested that some of them may date to as early as 200 BC. One problem with dating such artifacts is that they can't be dated directly and as a result are given dates of the associated artifacts or materials. However this method is open to error as many of the statues have probably been moved a number of times in the course of their history. One researcher in Mexico found that all the stone monuments that he studied had been reset multiple times. So there is a possiblity that these statues could be much older than proposed. I feel that they are.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94ab9/94ab9ff95c368a2e7dd797601071ee3b20130ec6" alt=""
I suggest that these statues were the work of the original Jaredites. They are not similar to the Mayan ones. There is some similarity to the Olmec statuary, but there is a definite similarity to the statues and stonework of the ancient Sumerians, the Jaredite source culture. The Jaredite culture had a long standing tradition for idol worship and very likely reverted to such practices in their periods of apostasy. We read that they had a written record of the old Sumerian practices which could have inspired their evil. The daughter of Jared referred to this record when she encouraged her father to overthrown his father, the king. We are told:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00f99/00f99b3628362da92b1cb88ae4d7301e970c51e1" alt=""
In my opinion, these statues are the work of the original Jaredites. If this is correct it would be another definite proof of the veracity of the Book of Mormon.
No comments:
Post a Comment